I don't understand how this could possibly work unless all photos had the same disclaimer. Unless a photo is shot spontaneously and then placed without any processing whatsoever, then it's reality has been intentionally altered...and even with a spontaneous shot and no processing, it's been unintentionally altered and perhaps intentionally selected.Every shot a professional photographer takes is set up from the beginning to achieve a look. Lighting, angle of shot, depth of field, having the model wear a corset and tape/tie certain areas, the type of fabric, the color and pattern of the fabric, the types of shoes, the relative size and placement of objects and subjects in the background, etc... Of course there are also things like fake eye lashes, contact lenses and of course makeup itself.Once the shot is taken, how does one not use Photoshop or other tool to further enhance the shot, and where do you draw the line on what would be considered altering the shot?If I were a publisher, I'd just post the disclaimer on every photo and be done with it, in which case it accomplishes nothing.